Tuesday, 5 January 2016

OVERALL REFERENCES FOR PROPOSAL




REFERENCES

 

Arbaat Hassan, N. A. (2009). The Level Of Environmental Knowledge, Awareness, Attitudes and Practices Among UKM Students.
Arslan, O. (2009). Quantitative evaluation of precautions on chemical tanker operations. Elsevier Ltd, 113-120.
Bougie, U. S. (2013). Research Method for Business. Wiley, 336-337.
Burns, C. (1956). Chemical accidents involving minors. Cerro de Pasco Corparation.
Can, S. (2014). Investigation of pre-service science teachers' attitudes towards laboratory safety. Elsevier Ltd.
Chris Bibby, a. M. (2014). Laboratory Measurement of the Acostical and Airflow Performance of Interior Natural Ventilation Openings and Silencers. . Elsevier, 15-22.
Dikabo Mogopodi, B. P. (2015). Assessment of Chemical Management Practices and Safety in Junior Secondary School Laboratories in Gaborone. Elevier Inc, 17-27.
Eugenia Flora Rosa Cossa, A. A. (2014). Effects of an In-service Program on Biology and Chemistry Teachers' Perception of the Role of Laboratory Work. Elsevier Ltd.
Fanny Bourrée, L. R. (2014). A comparison of three methods to identify chemicals hazards in French research laboratories. Elsevier, 324-330.
Feszterova, M. (2014). Education for Future Teachers to OHS Principle- Safety in Chemical Laboratory. Elsevier Ltd.
Frerichs, R. R. (2008). Simple Random Sampling. 3-41.
H.A. Aziz, A. S. (2014). Managing process chemicals, technology andequipment information for pilot plant based on Process Safety Management standard. Elsevier, 423-429.
Haoran Zhang, L. S. (2015). Researches and Applications on Geostatistical Simulation and Laboratory Modeling of Mineventilation Network and Gas Drainage Zone. Elsevier, 55-64.
Izabella Thomas, L. L.-A.-L. (2015). Computerization of a 'Controlled Language' to Write Medical Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Elsevier, 95-102.
J.Alaimo, P. (2010). Safety Teams : An Approach To Engage Students in Laboratory Safety . acs.pubs.org/jchemeduc.
J.Perkins, W. B. (1953). Safety in Chemical Laboratories. Illinois: Fisher Scientific Co.
J.Salkind, N. (2012). Exploring Research. Pearson.
Javier Fernandez, R. C. (2015). Competency training of students of the Faculty of Chemistry of the University of Barcelona by conducting internal audits. Elsevier, 59-62.
Kathryn A.Mcgarry, K. R. (2013). Student Involvement in Improving the Culture of Safety in Academic Laboratories. 1414-1417.
Lester Bynam, L. B. (2008). Deciding What to Keep, The battle over Chemical Inventories in Secondary School Laboratories. Elsevier.Inc, 18-23.
Manierre, M. J. (2015). Gaps in Knowledge: Tracking and Explaining Gender Differences in Health Information Seeking. Elsevier.ltd, 151-158.
María Moreno-Villanueva, M. C. (2015). MARK-AGE standard operating procedures (SOPs): A successful effort. Elsevier, 18-25.
Mcgarry, K. A. (2013). Student involvement in improving the culture of safety in Academic Laboratories. ACS Publications.
Mclellen, N. N. (1995). Descriptive Research Method. 1196-1211.
Murat Akçayır, G. A. (2015). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Elsevier Ltd, 334-342.
Neave, H. R. (2012). Deming's 14 Points for Management: Framework for Success. Wiley-Black Well, 561-570.
Nutrition., E. o. (2015). Standard operating procedures for ESPEN guidelines and consensus papers. elsevier, 1043-1051.
P. Sivaprakash, L. M. (2014). A Study on Handling of Hazardous Chemicals in Engineering. Elsevier, 187-191.
Peter J.Alaimo, J. M. (2010). Safety Teams: An Approach To Engage Students in Laboratory Safety. pubs.acs.org/jchemeduc.
Ray Borrow, J. F. (2014). Safe laboratory handling of Neisseria. Elsevier, 305-312.
Scruggs, C. E. (2013). Reducing hazardous chemicals in consumer products: proactive. Elsevier, 105-114.
Sendil Can, E. C. (2014). Investigation of pre service science teachers' attitudes towards laboratory safety. 3131-3136.
Striano, a. M. (2009). Managing Educational Transformation In The Globalized World: A Deweyen Perspective. Educational Theory, 379-393.
Stup, R. (2002). Standard Operating Procedures: Managing The Human Variables. National Mastitis Council Regional Meeting Proceeding, 11-18.
Sweet, R. S. (2013). A Systems Approach to an Institutional Laboratory Ventilation Management Plan. Elsevier Inc, 31-37.
systemsPaul Raftery, F. B. (2015). Laboratory Testing of a Displacement Ventilation Diffuser Forunderfloor Air Distribution Systems. Elsevier, 82-91.
Willmot, H. (1995). Managing the Academics: Commodification and Control in the Development of University Education in the U.K. Human and Relations, 993-1027.

CHAPTER 3




METHODOLOGY

3.0       INTRODUCTION

This chapter describes the methodology used to explore more about the good management in institutions and students’ preparation of knowledge about chemicals can improve students’ awareness in handling chemicals. This section explains                     a) research design, b) sampling frame, c) sampling technique, d) sampling size,                 e) population, f) data collection procedure, g) instruments, h) validity of instruments,    i) unit of analysis and j) plan of data analysis.

3.1       STUDY AREA
This research was conducting among students in Faculty of Education in Chemistry, Shah Alam, Selangor. The researchers are indicates about the good management that provides by the institutions in the laboratory and also student’s knowledge about chemicals that can improve students’ awareness in handling hazardous chemicals that can cause accidents. Many of students nowadays does not follow the rules in laboratory because their knowledge about chemicals are weak and also the management are very low in providing facilities.

3.2       RESEARCH DESIGN
The study adopted the quantitative research model and also include qualitative aspects into the study during data collection for consistency of evidence across source of data (Dikabo Mogopodi B. P., 2015). Therefore, the study is engaged with the quantitative study in order to having a respond and feedback of student of education in chemistry course about their knowledge and behaviour handling chemicals in the laboratory that provides by the management of the faculty in UITM, Shah Alam. Qualitative data will be using to support quantitative data by having some interview notes, transcript to focus group of chemistry students, answers to some open-ended questions and also some sources from the internet. All the data can be use to produce some valid inferences (Bougie, 2013).



3.3       SAMPLING FRAME
The sampling frame or the respondent of this study are the students from the faculty of Education in Chemistry, UITM, Shah Alam that are consist of eight semester students and each class categorize as one semester. The inclusion criteria include the respondents who is agrees to participate in this study during the study is conducted.

3.4       SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
The study is using the simple random sampling method as the suitable sampling approaches in this study. Simple random sampling is the basic selection process of sampling and also the easiest way to understand the technique. Subject of the population are sampled by a random process which is using random number generator or random number table from the list name and to make sure each person remaining in the population has the same probability of being selected for the sample (Frerichs, 2008). Independent and equal are the main process of simple random sampling. Equal means no bias that one person must be chosen rather than another and independent because the choice of one person does not bias the researcher for against the choice of another. The steps for choosing from the eight semester are (J.Salkind, 2012)
1.      The definition of the population of the selection place
2.      The listing of all members of the population for each class.
3.      The assignment of numbers to each member of the population.
4.      The use of a criterion to select the sample.



3.5       SAMPLE SIZE
The study use n=144 respondents from the whole course of Education Chemistry to be determine. The respondent is from part one until part eight which mostly using laboratory to do the experiments. The minimum of respondents should be 144 – 240 respondents by the maximum- table of Krejcie & Morgan, 1970 (J.Salkind, 2012).
Table 3.0 Krejcie & Morgan-to measure sample size
N-n
N-n
N-n
N-n
N-n
10-10
100-80
280-162
800-260
2800-338
15-14
110-86
290-165
850-265
3000-341
20-19
120-92
300-169
900-269
3500-246
25-24
130-97
320-175
950-274
4000-351
30-28
140-103
340-181
1000-278
4500-351
35-32
150-108
360-186
1100-285
5000-357
40-36
160-113
380-181
1200-291
6000-361
45-40
180-118
400-196
1300-297
7000-364
50-44
190-123
420-201
1400-302
8000-367
55-48
200-127
440-205
1500-306
9000-368
60-52
210-132
460-210
1600-310
10000-373
65-56
220-136
480-214
1700-313
15000-375
70-59
230-140
500-217
1800-317
20000-377
75-63
240-144
550-225
1900-320
30000-379
80-66
250-148
600-234
2000-322
40000-380
85-70
260-152
650-242
2200-327
50000-381
90-73
270-155
700-248
2400-331
75000-382
95-76
270-159
750-256
2600-335
100000-384
“N” is population size
“n” is sample size
(Krejcie & Morgan 1970)

3.6       POPULATION
Salkind, 2009 stated that population is the participants that agree to participate towards the study to generalize the result of the studies. Therefore 144 respondents will be determine and the respondents of this study are the students of Education Chemistry in the campus of UITM, Shah Alam that are consist from eight semester for the whole course.


3.7       DATA COLLECTING PROCEDURE
The studies will be given questionnaire to the students of Education in Chemistry and also some interview will be conducting to support the quantitative study for the purpose to gain information and to strengthen the data collection. This study are about to rose up the level of safety rules from the management that provided by the faculty in the laboratory and also the precautions or awareness of students handling chemicals from the knowledge that they gain during studying in the class.

3.8       INSTRUMENTS
      Data will be collect from the respondent through the questionnaire with the 5 point likert scale (1) to five (5) being: (1) strongly dissatisfied, (2) Dissatisfied, (3) Somewhat Satisfied (4) agree and (5) strongly satisfied. Some visit will be organize to the faculty laboratories and an observation sheet also will be using to collect data (Dikabo Mogopodi B. P., 2015). The questionnaire respondents perceptions on quality management services practices was adopted from Zeitz, Johannesson and Ritchie Jr ( 1997). The overall questionnaires then has been prepared in one language only which is in English. The originality of questionnaire was from Parasuraman and has been modified. Furthermore the questionnaire were been categorized in several section which are section A for respondent demographic and section B has been separate to academic resources, competence, attitude/ responsiveness, resources for administrators, reliability and responsiveness, and assurance and empathy.
            The questionnaire will be given to the students of Education in Chemistry at UITM, Shah Alam for content validity. The reliability of the instruments will be determine by conducting a pilot test in others faculty that include three courses of chemistry course which were not part of the population. The feedback from the pilot test was used to improve the final questionnaire. On the other, descriptive research will be conducting in this study which specified into;
1.      research questions
2.      design and
3.      data analysis
 And thus three types of items will be applied to the given topic. The descriptive statistics will tell the result what is the research finding about. The questions asked will determine the type of approach necessary to complete the accurate assessment (Mclellen, 1995).

3.9              VALIDITY OF INSTRUMENTS

The validity of the instrument was conducted to ensure its content validity. The content validity is necessary to ensure that all items in the questionnaires are relevant to measure the outcome (Salkind, 2012).

3.10             UNITS OF ANALYSIS
The study use questionnaire of good management in laboratory to have feedback or respond about the result of the good management in institutions and students’ knowledge about chemicals will improve the students to become more aware in handling chemicals. The studies are focusing about the communities from the course of Chemistry of education, UITM Shah Alam, Selangor.

3.11     PLAN OF DATA ANALYSIS
The study will be using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 20.0 software to analyse the quantitative data. Descriptive analysis in the form of frequencies, means, and standard deviation will be doing. Recommendations from the participants about improving chemical management practice will also absorb as part of the data (Dikabo Mogopodi B. P., 2015).


Table 3.1 Plan of data analysis


Research Objectives

Research Questions

Statistics



To determine the level of good quality management in institution that provide safety and health in the laboratory. 


What are the level of good quality management in institution that provide safety and health in the laboratory?



Frequency

To measure the level of knowledge among students of Education in Chemistry UITM, Shah Alam handling chemicals in laboratory.


What are the level of knowledge among students of Education in Chemistry UITM, Shah Alam handling chemicals in laboratory?



Frequency

To identify weather there is a significant different of student’s knowledge and awareness handling chemicals between genders in laboratory


What are the significant different of student’s knowledge and awareness handling chemicals between genders in laboratory?




T-test

CHAPTER 2



  

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.0       DEFINITIONS OF GOOD MANAGEMENT OF INSTITUTIONS TO IMPROVE MANAGEMENT IN SCIENCE LABORATORY

According to Edward Deming, good management means that training must be given to the employee because how can staff or anybody else do their job properly if they do not know what their job is. Although workers more appreciate to their job and become satisfaction when they doing a good job (Neave, 2012). In other words, in educational sector, managing and transformation being effectively when there are including of professionals, administrators, politicians and other stakeholder as leading forces to the success in educational system. (Striano, 2009). Besides that, to control the work of academics and its pressure of capitalist development, it needs to explore the connection between the changes in organizations and control in academics such as teaching, administration, and research (Willmot, 1995). In others study, focus in laboratory, The OSHA Laboratory Standard and Hazard Communication standard have been used the guidelines for the purpose to manage the safety of the laboratories and pilot plant. This guideline starting to be implement because accident and injuries continuously happen in laboratory and for the safety management hope that accident risk will be reduce (H.A. Aziz, 2014). . One of the good management strategies before handling chemicals are most companies make some interview for the research to be ongoing, intensive for data collection to make them know which chemical hazard need to be restrict from the products and to take the safest alternatives way (Scruggs, 2013). Furthermore, from the researched of (Ray Borrow, 2014), safe laboratory handling of chemicals need to focus on the use of safety cabinets during the manipulation and also it should be reflected in local risk assessments, safe practices of equipment and facilities, competency and also immunisation policies/training. Other than that, as we always seen when insert into laboratory, there are poor record keeping and also poor inventory management. For more worry, there are no place for disposal out-of-date stock or expired chemicals (Dikabo Mogopodi B. P., 2015). Therefore, complete list of H (hazard statement) and P (precautionary statement) should be available in each laboratory for more concern (Melania fesztrova, 2015);
·         Ventilation management

Ventilation management should have in every laboratory in institution to control exposures of volatiles chemicals. Laboratory ventilation systems are energy-intensive and can develop some of innovative methods for incorporating sustainable energy into the laboratory ventilation design for the successful 21st century of institutions (Sweet, 2013). In others studies, underfloor air distribution (UFAD) is one kind of air ventilation who used the underfloor plenum beneath a raised floor to provide the air conditioned through floor-mounted diffusers and it can discharged cool air both horizontal and vertical momentum components. This system can create a vertical temperature stratification when it is cooled and have impact on energy of chemical that volatiles in the laboratory. It also very easy to located everywhere on the large surface area of a raised access floo (systemsPaul Raftery, 2015). Furthermore, to solve gas disaster problem in laboratory, the management need to increase the air fresh volumes in the ventilation network. U + L type of ventilation network need to be performed and gas problem cannot be solved only by increasing the fresh air volume but it also need to resolve by combined multiple technological methods such as gas drainage tunnel (Haoran Zhang, 2015). The ventilation air system must be opening and silence using open area ratio for the airflow and open area sound. Higher the open area ratio indicates better performance (Chris Bibby, 2014).

Table 2.0  List of hazard H (hazard statement) and P (precautionary statement).
Sections
Sections
1.       Identification of manufacturer, name of chemical substance or chemical mixture
2.       Physical and chemical                     properties
3.       Hazard identification
4.       Stability and reactivity
5.       Compositions/information on ingredients
6.       Toxicological information
7.       First aid-measures
8.       Ecological Information
9.       Fire-fighting measures
10.    Disposal consideration
11.    Accidental release measures
12.    Transport Information
13.    Handling and sorage
14.    Regulatory information


2.1       BENEFICIAL OF USING STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES IN GOOD MANAGEMENT

Standard Operating procedures (SOP) is based on methodology and usually provided by the Association of Science. The guideline SOP aims to facilitate for the future projects, to streamline the consensus process and to ensure the quality and also the transparency (Nutrition., 2015). Furthermore, Standard Operating Procedures also means to remove variation of work performance that happen when people completing the same work process in different ways. Thus, process actually some kind of actions that workers need to complete their job with success (Stup, 2002). Besides that, Maria Moreno, 2015 use standard operating procedures (SOPs) to identify the material for sample collection, preparation and also good storage for the study of biomarkers of ageing. SOPs also cover for all aspects for the subject’s recruitment, shipment, collection, and distribution of biological sample and give beneficial for the binding of the project (María Moreno-Villanueva, 2015). Other than that, Written Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are taken by the company of organizations like health professionals as a proof that they can provide the safest care and it is one part of quality control in management process together with the connection of Law policy (Izabella Thomas, 2015).

2.2       PRECAUTIONS OF HANDLING CHEMICALS

Risk prevention in chemical laboratories need to have perfect knowledge of chemical’s effects and always have observance instructions for their handling (Melania fesztrova, 2015). One of the good precautions of handling chemicals in the laboratory, different types of chemicals must be stored in proper way and also to make sure it is safe because careless mistakes will create accidents and material losses (P. Sivaprakash, 2014). In France, the hygiene and safety correspondent in research laboratories need to be establish and update every year the list of chemicals used. This is because most of the chemicals in laboratories tend to be keep and become old products. The use of date also has been an expired and most of it not being used for over a year and this matter will bring to the increase of hazard (Fanny Bourrée, 2014). In others study, the information of process chemicals need to be characterised accurately of  fire and explosion, reactivity hazard, safety and health hazards to person, the erosive and corrosive effects on the instrumentation and equipment and incompatibility existence between materials that is always found around the process (H.A. Aziz, 2014). Furthermore, sometimes hazard that associated with liquid chemicals especially in tankers are more complex and dangerous compare to others, therefore extra knowledge, skills, and precautions needed for someone who work in the dangerous place that have heavy load of chemicals for example in tankers. Potential risks should be identified early with some observation of the frequencies of incidents and also the consequences in case the accidents/incidents might happen (Arslan, 2009). On the other hand, ensure that labels on hazardous chemicals are not removed or defaced and MSDS contains precautions of information must have for the employee’s references which given information about handling and using harmful substances and including some information about health hazards, fire and explosion hazards, physical characteristics, hazardous ingredients, personal protective equipment, and spill procedures (U.S Department of Labor OSHA, 2002). Besides that, for safety of students that we must concern, some recommendations need to be follow by the management are before doing some experiments using chemicals, the instructor need to demonstrate it first to the students on how to use it in proper way. Second, Students should be train using proper personal protective equipment (PPE) every time they do experiments in laboratory and last but not least, students also should be trained in the environmental impact of chemicals (Lester Bynam, 2008).

Figure 2.0 Residue from incompatible chemicals stored together corroding the storage cabinet in laboratory

Figure 2.1 Chemical storage containers with faded labels







2.3       STUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE AND BEHAVIOR IN LABORATORY

Laboratory skills and learning outcomes by students has been ignored to the great extent. University students should have positive attitude in learning science skills and science content when they are in science laboratory. This is important for them because it can affect the efficiency of lab training and it is important for their future to do research in science field. (Murat Akçayır, 2015). In addition, research in science of education has shown that students’ interpretations and idea actually more based on their everyday life experiences and language with some learning of scientific knowledge that has been introduced during science classes and their ability to gain information from the scientific correct idea (Zacharia, 2007 as cited in Mohammad Reza Farrokhnia, 2009). When students have improved their skills integrated new knowledge and attitude, they become improve in the laboratory tasks and also they reached responsibility concerning to acquire quality management, more respect to the environment and also towards safety (Javier Fernandez, 2015). Furthermore in Sendil Can et.al, 2014 study for pre-service science teachers’ attitudes towards laboratory safety indicate that, they can make use of their experience during practical and skill their gain in their daily lives. They believe that the positive attitudes and knowledge they develop towards laboratory safety especially handling chemicals stuff can be more effective during their professional career. In others study, pre-service science teachers self-efficacy and their anxiety towards chemistry laboratory have negative relationship which is self-efficacy actually have negative predictor towards chemistry laboratory anxiety and higher anxiety in the chemistry laboratory have lower level of self-efficacy (Fatma Gulay Kirbaslar,2014). Teachers who get workshop training also share their view that the experience their gained will serve to stimulate all of their students to become more interested to learn science subject such as chemistry and biology in laboratory work while doing the experiments ( Eugenia Flora Rosa Cossa, 2015). Besides that, the use of safety teams is kind of useful way to bond students with safety education in laboratory and they respect to use the PPE, lab cleanliness and also the waste collection. Safety teams also encourage students about safety conversation and performance critique during lab experiments. They become critical evaluation of lab practice and increase their attentiveness to laboratory safety and also they have professionalism attitude in the labs (Peter J.Alaimo, 2010).

2.4       KNOWLEDGE AND SAFETY AWARENESS BETWEEN GENDERS

There is a body of evidence suggesting that females are more likely to search for information seeking than males. The results from health information trends survey (HINTS) show that females like to gain information about everything over the internet over time than males (Manierre, 2015). In the terms of laboratory education, the pre-service science teachers’ attitudes towards laboratory safety are not significantly affected by variables such as gender especially to do their practical successfully and gain experience and develop towards laboratory safety (Sendil Can, 2014). From others study, according from the result, female students’ self-efficacy levels in laboratory are higher in the terms of the gender variables but there are no significance different for pre service science teachers’ anxiety levels affected by the gender (Fatma Gulay Kirbaslar,2014). Based on Arbaat Hassan, 2009 study, there are no significance different based on genders in knowledge, awareness and practices towards environment in laboratory, but in terms of attitudes, females students had the higher attitudes towards environment in laboratory compared to males students (Arbaat Hassan, 2009).

2.5       TYPES OF HAZARDOUS AND NON-HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS

Hazardous chemicals mostly present physical or health treats to students, workers in industrial, academic laboratories and clinical in laboratories. They include carcinogens, toxins, irritants, corrosives, sensitizers, hepatotoxins, nephrotoxins, neurotoxins as well as agents that act on the hematopoietic systems or damage the lungs, skin, eyes, or mucous membranes (U.S Department of Labor OSHA, 2002). When chemicals contact with hazard of wounding (cutting, burning, alkali-burning), hot, caustic or corrosive chemicals it is become extremely dangerous and extra care need to be implement (Melania Feszterova, 2015)
Figure 2.2 Example of chemicals that could be explosive found in the laboratory

List of chemical inventory that should be completed by institutions and school instructor should prepare in table 2.2 (Lester Bynam, 2008).
Table 2.1 Abbreviations used in the table 2.2
Abbreviations used in the table
abs
absorption (skin)
CNS
central nervous system
IARC
International Agency for
Research on Cancer
ing
ingestion
inh
inhalation
NTP
National Toxicology Program
resp
respiratory
RA
reasonably anticipated to be a
human carcinogen (NTP designation)
rxn
Reaction



Table 2.2 List of chemicals and relevant hazard.
Chemical
Relevant Hazard
Acetal
Forms explosive peroxides without concerntration
Acetonitrile
Toxic(inh, ing, abs)
Acetyl bromide
Irritant (skin, eyes, resp); violent rxn with water
Acetyl chloride
Irritant (resp), toxic; violent rxn with water
Acrylamide (IARC 2B)
Neurotoxin; carcinogen; toxic (abs)
Aluminum chloride, anhydrous
Violent rxn with water
Antimony, powder
Dust fire/explosion hazard; contact with acid forms SbH3;
poison (inh, ing)
Asbestos
Carcinogen
Barium chromate
Carcinogen (Cr(VI))
Benzene
Carcinogen
Benzidine
Carcinogen
Benzoyl nitrate
Unstable compound. Explosive decomposition in water; heat and light sensitive explosive
Bromine
Oxidizer; corrosive; violent rxn with several compounds
Bromoform
Irritant (skin, eyes, resp); lachrymator; poison (ing)
Cadmium and its compounds
Carcinogen
Calcium carbide
Dangerous when wet (liberates acetylene)
Calcium cyanide
Poison (inh, ing)
Carbon disulfide
Extremely flammable; acute CNS/peripheral toxin; reproductive toxin
Carbon monoxide
Toxic
Chlorine
Oxidizer, corrosive; irritant (inh); poison (inh)
Diaminotrinitrobenzene
Highly explosive
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Carcinogen
Dimethylaniline
Poison (inh, ing, abs)
Dinitrophenol
Explosive
Ethyl ether
Forms peroxides
Ethylene dichloride
(1,2-dichloroethane)
Toxic (inh, ing)
Ethylene oxide
Explosive; poison (ing, abs) carcinogen
Ferrous sulfide
Water reactive
Fluorine
Powerful oxidizing agent; poison (inh, ing, abs)
Hydrazine (IARC 2B)
Powerful reducing agent; explosive; corrosive; carcinogen
Hydrofluoric acid and
solutions containing HF
Corrosive; may be fatal if inhaled or ingested (liquid and vapour can cause severe burns not always immediately painful or visible but possibly fatal)
Hydrogen
Flammable gas
Hydrogen bromide (anhydrous)
Poison (inh); corrosive
Hydrogen chloride (anhydrous)
Poison (inh); corrosive
Hydrogen sulfide, gas
Poison (inh); flammable
Lithium nitrate
Oxidizer
Magnesium, metal
Water reactive; violent rxn with many compounds
Mercuric compounds
Neurotoxic
Mercury
Poison (inh)
Methyl bromide
Poison (inh)
a-Naphthylamine
Carcinogen
Nitric oxide
Corrosive; poison (inh); irritant (skin, eye, resp)
Nitrobenzene
Poison (inh, ing, abs)
Perchloric acid
Powerful oxidizer when hot; violent rxn with many compounds
when hot
Phosphorous pentasulfide
Water reactive; poison (ing); irritant (skin, eye)
Potassium sulfide
Spontaneously combustible; explosive in dust or powder form;
poison (inh, ing)
Silver cyanide
Poison (inh, ing, abs)
Silver nitrate
Oxidizer; corrosive; may be fatal if ingested; poison (ing);
incompatible with many compounds
Sodium chromate
Oxidizer; corrosive; carcinogen (Cr(VI))
Sodium sulfide
Poison (ing); spont. combustable
Tetrafluoroethylene
Forms explosive peroxides